Select Page

Jinkies!

If God is an ineffable mystery that underlies ourselves and the world, then we are left with a dilemma: how does one solve a mystery that cannot be described? Philosopher Alan Watts attempts to find a solution in his talk The Tao of Philosophy 2: Images of God. He posits (or maybe negates?) that transcendence lies in the unity of opposites. He asks, “What gives us any ghost of a notion that we’re here, except by contrast with the fact that we once weren’t, And later on won’t be? But this thing is a cycle, like positive and negative poles in electricity” (Watts, n.d.). The topic of transcendence, and the key to understanding God, is to bridge the gap between the divine and ourselves. It therefore goes to reason that the solution to the mystery lies with one of those two opposite entities. So let’s borrow from the detective skills of Scooby Doo and split-up, gang.

First let’s consider man. Us. “When we form images of God they’re all really exhibitions of our lack of faith,” says Watts, “If you let go of all the idols you will, of course, discover that what this unknown is—which is the foundation of the universe—is precisely you….it’s not the chronic sense of muscular strain which we usually call ‘I’” (n.d.). We are further divided into male and female; the positive anima and the negative animus. We are acutely aware of existing as opposites, but somehow manage to ignore the earthly opposites all around us. He gives the example of a painting. We see the image, but not the canvas that stands beneath it. The canvas is sub-stance. Like the earth, the foundations that hold up the image are essential to existence of the image. As humans, we do not exist without the earth we are bound to, and to understand ourselves we must remember that we are both sides of the opposites.
The prime suspect behind the ultimate mystery is God. Watts shares the rationale of many theologians in support of intelligent design: “if you are intelligent and reasonable, you cannot be the product of a mechanical and meaningless universe” ( n.d.). God can also be understood as unity of opposites. She may be the black infinity of space, but the only reason we know there is an infinite universe is because of the stars that stand against it to provide depth. We perceive God in opposites because we understand in opposites. By learning to see ourselves we are then able to approach seeing God.
So we see man, we see god, we have caught the Hannah-Barbarian monster, and the Scooby gang removes the rubber mask to reveal a version of ourselves underneath (the substance) that is both earthly and divine. Watt’s solves the “profound, central mystery,” concluding “the attitude of faith is to stop chasing it…all these ideas of the “spiritual,” the “godly,”…[are] not the only way of being religious and of relating to the ineffable mystery that underlies ourselves and the world” (n.d.). We can’t view God as an old white male because it stops us from seeing the young black female that God is also. God is opposites, and the only way we can perceive their existence is to remember that we are as well.

Keystone Ideals

Abbot Suger defines the “happy accident” in extraordinary terms. Responsible for inventing all of medieval gothic architecture and bringing elaborate art and ornamentation to Catholicism can all be traced back to a misunderstanding. His abbey was named for St. Denis, who shared a name with an ancient greek philosopher, who was himself the misattributed author of a poorly translated book called The Heavenly Hierarchies. As a collector and lover of antiquity, Suger lunged at the opportunity to own a text by his own patron “saint,” and in those words that directly attributed beauty to God he found justification to embark on what would be his life’s work: making catholicism majestic.
Abbot Suger saw architecture has a means to transcendence. God worked through the greatest artisans to create spaces that all pointed to heaven. “‘Bright,’ he says, ‘is the noble edifice that is pervaded by new light,’ and in these words he anticipates all the architectural aspirations of the next 200 years” (Clark, 2005). He creates high windows of intricate stained glass to cast fascinating splashes of color across his Chapel. He pushed the spires and arches to be higher and higher until they towered over the congregation in dizzying displays of engineering. Not only were the construction techniques revolutionary, but the mathematics utilizing the golden ratio that created blueprint were viewed as divine geometry.
Walking into Chartres Cathedral today is awe-inspiring because it is an experience we’ve only imagined from pictures and films, but for medieval humans it was something they had never imagined. To any person gazing upon the unthinkable design and grandeur they were visually aided in their ability to perceive divinity. The relationship of beauty, design, and God made tangible to guide transcendental thought. From the depths of the Dark Ages full of ugly and painful existence was a heavenly palace that could only be described as divine, and the sight opened up new avenues of higher thinking that were otherwise not possible.

All Things Go, All Things Know

Alone in a dark forest lit by moonlight reflecting on the blanket of snow, Robert Frost found himself in the midst of a transcendent experience. In his poem Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening, Frost describes a horseback trip he took alone through the woods. He reigns his horse to stop in the middle of the path to look and listen to the stillness. Alone with his thoughts and that magical vista of the dark and frozen forest he perceives the divine presence that forces him to pause and reflect. Despite “promises to keep / and miles to go,” (1983) Frost is seemingly unable to control his actions because he shares them with a higher power that fills him in that moment.
Frost’s experience is relatable to many of us. I have certainly beheld the beauty of nature on a quiet winter night. I often think of Chicago with similar connotations. Winter twilight in Chicago can seem like a magical time. I might even call it “a witching hour.” the snow absorbs the sounds of the city. The plow won’t arrive to clear the street until tomorrow, so all the noise of the traffic is frozen for the night. Most of the people are warm in their homes, and for the lone traveler it is silent and still like Frost’s woods. The one thing that sticks out most in my memory is the orange glow the entire city takes on. The only light comes from the old tinted street lights, and as those colors reflect, refract, and become absorbed by snow it lights up the city in a diffused glow that comes from beneath instead of above.
What Frost’s poem offers is the transcendent words and focus that we may not be able to recognize on our own. We may all walk through those moments of divinity, but we don’t always stop, and certainly don’t often put it into poetic terms. Frost gives me a context for my view of Chicago that I lacked on my own. As a guide through a transcendental meditation on the beauty of winter quiet I can understand beauty I only saw previously. Now aware of the method, it is important to continue to look and remember to take the time to stop when the moment strikes again. Our own horse may want to press on to the next farmhouse, but like Frost discovered the experience is worth the break.

The Blazing World

In the Hindu story of Arjuna from the Bhagavad Gita, the deity Krishna appears to him and shows him what God looks like. Like all religious texts, this story is intended as an allegorical meditation for those who read it. Transcendence is not possible, but is still the goal of human spirituality. Arjuna is directly gifted transcendence from Krishna—he looks directly at it and understands—and then by reading the story we can better imagine what he was looking at in terms that make more sense to our earthly lives. After Krishna reveals himself in all of his divine forms simultaneously, Arjuna responds, “I see you, who are so difficult to behold, shining like a fiery sun blazing in every direction” (Selections from the Bhagavad-Gita, n.d.).
Arjuna’s transcendence is only temporary, thankfully, because he seemed unable to handle it. “O Krishna, now that I have seen your gentle human form my mind is again composed and returned to normal,” he exclaims. A “transcendent experience” must be temporary. If one “transcends” completely then there is no coming back. Like Moses, Buddha, Mohammad, Heracles, Jesus, or Obi-Wan Kenobi (if one believes their respective legends), once they reached the point of full transcendence they were no longer able to stay in their same form among the rest of us. They became one with the force and their teachings leave us a map to follow.
Transcendence to me is a return. As heroes on the journey of life we are always in cycles between ordinary worlds and magical ones beyond our previous understanding. At some point we either fail and remain lost in that special world, or we master it and return to where we started with a divine understanding of both worlds. To combine two planes and exist simultaneously in two dimensions is transcendence. We transcend small worlds all the time. The first day of school is entry into a special world and receiving a diploma is a symbolic exit from that world with an awarded boon to take back with us. We may not think about it in those terms, but a graduation at any level is the end to one journey and the beginning of a new cycle. The transcend Arjuna is describing isn’t his Jr. High Graduation. There is one big final transcending where we leave the special world of life to return to wherever we came from before that. We have been here so long we don’t even remember where we came from. Life is a place of duality where we have male and female psyche and experience the flow of time in befores and afters. The one thing we know about the ordinary world of our birth is that it was eternal and free of duality. To transcend is to go through earthly apotheosis. We must realize we are both elements of opposites—both male and female—and in that awareness of the whole we surpass the divisions of four dimensional duality. When we transcend we are then both man and divine because we finally comprehend that there isn’t actually a difference.

Where No Man Has Gone Before

Previous discussion topics have covered the concepts of altruism and non-sense. In studying transcendence, it is clear that all spiritual roads point to it in united direction. The great horizon of human understanding that began this journey ends like all vistas in a vanishing point where all angles intersect. We know that they don’t actually stop at a big X on the ground where God is standing. If we were to follow them they may run parallel forever, but along the journey our ability to see and comprehend will always have the appearance of a vertex of culmination, of transcendence.
Altruism goes far beyond looking out for other human beings. In practice, it is exemplified by putting the needs of others ahead of ones own. As Spock taught us in 1982’s Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan, “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.” An understanding of true altruism is to comprehend that there are not “other human beings,” there is only the single “us.” It’s easy to be altruistic once that understanding is reached because the choice has been removed. It isn’t “should I help me or you,” it’s just us out here, and our purpose is to move forward together. Of course, another way to describe seeing beyond barriers is “transcendence.” To achieve altruism is to surpass individuality in a form of transcendence.
Likewise non-sense is a transcendental path to follow. As the Zen Buddhists demonstrate through their illogical Koans (sorry, Spock) there is divinity in anti-thought. Thinking beyond opposites is almost like a warm-up exercise for an improv troupe. In order to get the brain thinking in terms that surpass our understanding requires thinking things we don’t understand. What is the sound of one hand clapping? How is a raven like a writing desk? Why is an orange? Non-sense is the antithesis of sense, and to occupy both states of mind is to transcend them both.
If both non-sense and altruism are paths along the horizon leading to transcendence, it is likely that any spiritual path followed to its terminus will lead their eventually as well. It isn’t really that any one of these paths in particular is the right path. Whether we are pondering the divine geometry of majestic architecture or the forest after a fresh dusting of snow, all roads lead to the same conclusion. The thing about spirituality is that it takes effort and involves putting ourselves into it. When we put ourselves into anything, we will eventually see ourselves wherever we look, and when we no longer perceive any separation then we have achieved what we set out to do. We have reached the vanishing point, and none of us know what happens after that.
References

Clark, K. (2005). Civilisation. John Murray Pubs Ltd.

Frost, R. (1983). The Random House Book of Poetry for Children (J. Prelutsky & A. Lobel, Eds.). Penguin Random House.

Luibheid, C. (1987). Pseudo-Dionysius The Complete Works (1st ed.). Paulist Press.

Selections from the Bhagavad-Gita. (n.d.). unknown.

Watts, A. (n.d.). The Tao of Philosophy 2: Images of God. The Library. Retrieved September 26, 2021, from https://www.organism.earth/library/document/tao-of-philosophy-2